I wouldn't want to see too much of that. A quick glance shows over 3000 custom tags in the Gallery - who chooses which custom tags go in? And that wouldn't solve your problem - if you have 100 custom tags you use today, and 99 of them are "integrated" in a future edition, you still have to play games with your host's support.
--- Billy Cravens (who thinks there is such a thing as TOO MUCH out of the box functionality) -----Original Message----- From: Rick Eidson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:17 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted :: I think would be great to start seeing some of the custom tags built in to new versions of CF. I have some sites that are hosted on servers I do not control so I can't use some cutome tags or it takes me day's to get support to install something I need now. Rick -----Original Message----- From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 22, 2002 9:18 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CF's Most Wanted :: > Abilty to resize images on the fly, store in cache, read > dimensions, etc. > (should be a cinch with Macromedia's expertise in graphic > products [yea, right]) There are plenty of CFX tags out there that do this. I'm not saying we shouldn't do it - just that solutions exist already. :) > locking: > Needs to protect the server. Period. Sure - the answer is to use locking - but I'm assuming your saying that we _shouldnt_ need locking for server stability. There will _always_ be a need for "logical" type locks. > cfdirectory: > Please just give us one more attribute (filesonly=True, > or type="file") or update filter to accept type="file" or > type="dir". Those directory dots irk me 99% of the time I > use the tag. Hey, just use startrow=3 when looping. ;) > c# support: > I'm not even sure this is a possilbilty and it's probably > a little early to call for it, but something to think about. Um - you mean writing C#? Why? That's like asking for Perl support. Why not just use perl.exe? > NOTE: I'm also aware that some some of these things may > already be alleviated or improved upon in NEO. For all the > Beta testers and PDA hounds out there, please do not jump in > on this discussion and say "That's already developed" and > then the subsequent "You're not allowed to say that" and then > I have to say "Please keep this discussion in a pre-NEO > context" etc, etc. So, I'll go ahead and say that now, > please keep this discussion to pre-NEO improvements. > Although NEO is on it's way, please just submit features you > have thought and dreamt about prior to NEO, and future releases. Neo, what's Neo? :) ======================================================================= Raymond Camden, Principal Spectra Compliance Engineer for Macromedia Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
