> Well, I'm biased - heck, I liked QofQ in CF5, but I think > you should check out the docs for QofQ in MX. If you have > avoided it in the past, there is no reason not to now. > > For example, to me, the biggest problem was the inability > to do a case insenstive search. That has been corrected.
Here are some of the problems I've seen: 1. Shockingly bad performance - in some cases, taking nearly 20 milliseconds to retrieve one record based on a single unique integer field search from a set of ~150 records! You'd get better performance by searching the query using ValueList and ListFind! 2. Data truncation - that's kind of a bummer. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
