This is the web industry remember. If you move too slow people think you are dead. How long have we been waiting on Neo? How long have we been under NDA where would couldn't point out the problems with Neo? It is high time to start bickering and complaining, so that CF 6.1 will rock.
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:15 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > :) Give the M & M boys and girls a chance. We're all free to move to > another architecture if we want but i would rather give them a chance to > get it right for the final release and then we can bicker and complain > about how CF6 will never be as fast as we want it. > > my 2 credits > > Bill Wheatley > Senior Database Developer > Ediets.com > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > 954.360.9022 X159 > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:59 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > I wasn't comparing 4.5.1 and 5. In fact in an earlier email I pointed > out the almost 400% performance increase between those revisions. > However, let's be realistic about what is going to be the determining > factor in CFMX performance; the underlying J2EE engine. While I respect > your efforts on CF for Linux thus far, I gotta think that IBM has a bit > more resources to throw at the problem and they still haven't solved it. > > -Matt > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jesse Noller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:54 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > Matt, here is where you and I disagree alot: > > > > CF 5 > performance than 4.5.1, hands down. Period. > > > > Hopefully, when we *release* CFMX, CFMX will be > CF5. The performance > for > > the product line has not "plateued". It keeps getting faster. > > > > For instance: 4.5.1 linux vs. CF5 linux. Show me that the performance > is > > the same. It is *not*. > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:45 AM > > > To: CF-Talk > > > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > > > > > > No performance advantage really. You should upgrade for the > > > new features > > > though. > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Matthew R. Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 8:30 AM > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > Subject: RE: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > > > > > So, in a small company like mine, where I have maybe 5 > > > people using CF > > > > at once on an intranet application, (I also use CF from a > > > shared host) > > > > there is no advantage to going to MX? I'm still waiting for a > great > > > > reason to upgrade to CF 5.0. > > > > > > > > - Matt Small > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 11:11 AM > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > Subject: CFMX performance (was RE: CF MX) > > > > > > > > Yup, you're right. Well in that case on with the ensuing flame > war. > > > > > > > > First the caveats; CFMX has not been tuned for performance yet > > > according > > > > to MM. > > > > > > > > With that aside, I have been working with Neo since the > > > alpha days and > > > > have seen it change quite a bit since then. During that time I > have > > > > learned that CFMX will have a performance threshold very > > > close to that > > > > of JSP. For those of you who don't know, JSP doesn't > > > actually perform > > > > that well. On a single server, a properly built CF 5 > > > application would > > > > blow away a properly built JSP application. This is a fact > > > that can be > > > > easily proved today. However, JSP is more scalable than CF > > > 5. This is > > > an > > > > important distinction depending on what type of load your > > > application > > > is > > > > planning on supporting. If you are a shared hosting > > > provider, you will > > > > be able to support less web applications on the same server > > > than with > > > CF > > > > 5. If you maintain a small site that only uses a single server, > you > > > will > > > > need more server resources to provide the same level of > performance > > > you > > > > are used today with CF 5. > > > > > > > > With all that being said, if you currently run a web > > > application that > > > > depends on more than one CF server, CFMX is going to be great. > Using > > > > J2EE, you will be able to partition your application on top > > > different > > > > servers to increase its scalability. With a properly built CFMX > > > > application you will be able to simply add more servers as needed. > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:44 AM > > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > > Subject: RE: CF MX > > > > > > > > > > Jump over to the Neo forums on the beta site - Libby English of > > > > > Macromedia : "You can now discuss all aspects of the new CF > > > > release..." > > > > > > > > > > --- > > > > > Billy Cravens > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 9:39 AM > > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > > Subject: RE: CF MX > > > > > > > > > > That information is NDA at this point. > > > > > > > > > > -Matt > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 7:28 AM > > > > > > To: CF-Talk > > > > > > Subject: CF MX > > > > > > > > > > > > Now that i'm at a new job i need tow ork my bosses over to get > > > them > > > > to > > > > > > upgrade from CF 4 (ugh) to cF MX. i need to find a page > > > that shows > > > > the > > > > > > performance stats compared to older versions any ideas? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bill Wheatley > > > > > > Senior Database Developer > > > > > > Ediets.com > > > > > > Macromedia Certified Coldfusion Developer > > > > > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
