Ben, et al... That's great, makes total sense.
So why is .NET less expensive for an Enterprise implementation (2-4 CPUs) than J2EE? -----Original Message----- From: Ben Forta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:45 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo Which is why it says "supports the .NET framework" and not "is a .NET whatever". Actually, FYI, a while back I asked a .NET Product Manager at Microsoft "What must CF do to integrate with .NET?". His response, "consume .NET services". CFMX does that. It also lets you create services for .NET (easier than you could in any .NET language), it runs on .NET servers, and can also invoke objects running in the CLR (even though it does not run in the CLR itself). So yep, definitely "supports the .NET framework". :-) --- Ben -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:41 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFMX/.NET - buzzword bingo Is the architecture of CFMX going to be totally rewritten? I keep hearing the words "supports the .NET Framework" being thrown around. Where? How? Just b/c it runs on MS servers, and has support for SOAP/Web Services, doesn't make it integrated with the .NET framework. (CFMX in no way supports the CLR) --- Billy Cravens ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-talk@houseoffusion.com/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
