That is why some go with a multi-way commit. This ensures that a transaction can not be completed until it is committed on all servers.
-Matt > -----Original Message----- > From: Jeffry Houser [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Saturday, May 11, 2002 12:13 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Geographical redundancy? > > At 11:42 AM 5/11/2002 -0700, you wrote: > > > What are you going to do if that next bomb falls on your server? > >That > > > seems like a pretty hefty requirement. You'd have to do consistent > > > backups > > > to some remote location on the other side of the world. > > > > >You would need to do real time replication or a multi-way commit type > >setup, so you can have transactional integrity across servers that are > >regionally separated. > > It makes sense. Although, I'd be hard-pressed to guarantee that there > would be no loss of data. ( It depends how real-time the replication is > ). > > > -- > Jeffry Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Need a Web Developer? Contact me! > AIM: Reboog711 | Fax / Phone: 860-223-7946 > -- > My Books: http://www.instantcoldfusion.com > My Band: http://www.farcryfly.com > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
