> I'd dispute that. I've run several COM apps that worked with > CF 4 and 5 (and even CF 3!) on CF MX, and some work while others > don't. CF MX uses a third-party COM interface for Java, JIntegra. > I suspect that it has some limitations.
True, I should have put "As good as they've got" - it's better than previous versions, but FAR from perfect... > I don't think this is an accurate representation; I think you can call > methods that take parameters in CF 3 and newer versions, as long as those > parameters can be represented as strings or Variants. That hasn't changed > much in newer versions, either. In CF4.x I couldn't get methods with parameters to work at all, they work better in CF5, but still not perfect, I never tried in CF3, so I can't comment on that Simple things like .replace() just wouldn't work in CF4.5 for me Philip Arnold Technical Director Certified ColdFusion Developer ASP Multimedia Limited Switchboard: +44 (0)20 8680 8099 Fax: +44 (0)20 8686 7911 www.aspmedia.co.uk www.aspevents.net An ISO9001 registered company. ********************************************************************** This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager. ********************************************************************** ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
