Good point Zac, For the curious I did the N=10,000 test with a udf (exact same functionality) replacing the custom tag.
results: 10,000 calls in 1833 ms, or about 9 times as fast as cfmodule! </rob> -----Original Message----- From: Zac Spitzer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, May 31, 2002 1:40 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: cf_ vs cfmodule (was: Quick question on custom tags) -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 |10000 tag calls: |CF_ = 15262 ms |CFMODULE = 20509 ms ok compare that to a UDF function or just including the the file as an cfinclude and you will see why OO is nice but plain old linear code is fast lots of overhead with cfmodule z -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6-2 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAjz3tXwACgkQm98oI6K7h0jjogCgswkSD63N1VaMSaJ3xd5ggUn2 MwwAoNSt39l0WvqlS6pORX5W4OY4oLbA =WLWt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
