> An interesting thing that many developers overlook, or just don't know -
is
> that there is actually a performance increase in SETTING your "variables"
> scope variables as well as reading them.


Very true, however, I find that the performance increase is not worth a
little bit messier code.  I think they should shorten the variables scope or
even make a synonym for it.  Maybe "vars" or something.  If you start having
long equations, adding "variables." before all your variables could result
in a long equation.

It probably wouldn't be practical to add another scope like that as some
people probably have variables named "vars", but it's just a thought.



Ben Johnson
Hostworks, Inc.

______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to