Hello - Sorry about that. The original post was I would assume me. My mail runs through a networks that is shared with the website address below - a very very large corporate law firm. They have very tight filters and my mail gets checked by them since it is on the same server. My post however did not contain anything that should have been filtered.. I just think the filter caught a phrase or a word that must have been blocked.
I do find it really interesting that you received this. Anyhow - my apologies for any confusion. jay Dave Watts wrote: Interesting, apparently there's an inappropriate comment in my reply below, I just got this from gibney.com .... My guess is that the filter was complaining about the content of the original message, rather than the comment that you wrote yourself in response. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ <http://www.figleaf.com/> voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
