In production, running on Solaris with CF5 on a request 3 levels deep (I normally haven't gone deeper than that) the FB overhead was 20ms on average. (CF5) on decent sized machine. Not even a consideration!
Cheers -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 14, 2002 3:06 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: fusebox 3.0 alright, i will admit that i used to be a big fusebox fan. however after seeing that it took 400 milsecs to load a login page, i decided to drop it. and yes i did follow the methodology exactly. now i used the simple form / action methodology with a bunch of custom tags for reusability. what i'm wondering is if anyone out there has been using the new fusebox 3.0 methodology and how it is working out for you. is it faster in terms of speed of programming and execution. anything would help Anthony Petruzzi Webmaster 954-321-4703 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.sheriff.org ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
