Hi Stacy, They have a com object, but I'd think that would need to be locked as well. There is a cgi, but I personally hate cgi's when newer tech is available, and I have no clue about locking that!
I haven't looked at simulating a form post or anything else yet - it needs to be SSL, of course. Is CFHTTP fixed and capable of HTTPS now? We're at CF 5.0 - not MX. Thanks, jeff -----Original Message----- From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:43 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: CFX_PayFlowPro Hi Jeff, I'm not too familiar with that tag (I guess cause its for a competitor of ours ;-) but having to lock at all might seriously impede performance no? Is there another way to interact with their service? Sorry if that's not much help... Stace -----Original Message----- From: Jeff Beer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, June 21, 2002 3:35 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: CFX_PayFlowPro Does anyone know for sure if this CFX tag can be locked in read-only mode, or if it needs to be exclusive? TIA, Jeff Jeff Beer Director of Application Development Digital Stormfront, Inc http://www.digitalstormfront.com <http://www.digitalstormfront.com> ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
