> Interesting. So there's no plans in the pipeline to address > known issues such as poor COM performance and stuff like that?
I don't know how much they can do about that anyway. To provide COM integration, they're using a third-party product called JIntegra, from Intrinsyc: http://www.intrinsyc.com/products/bridging/jintegra.asp So, I don't imagine that there's much MM can do other than provide JIntegra updates as they're made available. Of course, I could be wrong, but that's my guess. By the way, anyone interested in COM integration in CF MX might want to spend some time on the Intrinsyc site - there's a decent amount of information there. I don't yet know how much is relevant to CF MX, but it's worth a look. There's also another product there, JaNET, which provides a Java-to-.NET bridge. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
