> However, my point was simply that blindly following XML syntax for CFML may > have unintended consequences. > > Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software
Agreed and I was just following up with how to avoid that. :) But, I also have another question as well... if we (the developers) do take that precaution to make sure that our stuff works and nothing is executed twice, should we be following that standard? I'm seeing that in just about every sample / tutorial all over the place and ... I'm beginning to wonder if Apache / IIS / any other webserver is just going to surprise everyone and switch over to that format (altho, they can't because ... well, that's one way to break all the old webpages, isn't it?). By following that example, what am I gaining? being XHTML compliant? Who cares? What if I never do XHTML? <<insert other annoying questions here>> ~Todd -- ============================================================ Todd Rafferty ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) - http://www.web-rat.com/ | Team Macromedia Volunteer for ColdFusion | http://www.macromedia.com/support/forums/team_macromedia/ | http://www.flashCFM.com/ - webRat (Moderator) | http://www.ultrashock.com/ - webRat (Back-end Moderator) | ============================================================ ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
