CFSCRIPT still has its uses and I happen to use it all the time when it comes to large groups of simple syntax. Its definitely not dead.
> > You can't "comply" the CF markup language to an XML standard, it's not > XML. > > True, it's not XML, but that doesn't mean the code that I write can't comply > with XML. With the exception of <cfscript> blocks, I can't think of any > part of ColdFusion that can't comply with XML. Anybody know of any? And > now with CFMX, <cfscript> really isn't necessary. > > > > Ben Johnson > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
