How has locking changed in CFMX so that it's no longer required in this situation? I haven't been following many of the CFMX discussions since we have no immediate plans to move to that platform.
Jim ----- Original Message ----- From: "Raymond Camden" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 12:07 PM Subject: RE: nuther lockin Q? > If CF5: Repeat after me (again): If I _type_ session (or application or > server), I type lock. Using that rule, yes, you need a lock. > > <cflock scope="session" type="readOnly" timeout=3> > your code > </cflock> > > In CFMX, I would not use the lock. > > ======================================================================= > Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia > > Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Yahoo IM : morpheus > > "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Critter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:57 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: nuther lockin Q? > > > > > > oi CF-Talk,!! > > > > I've got this on a few pages: > > > > <cfif not isDefined("Session.Auth.iUserID") or > > Session.Auth.iUserID eq ""> > > <cflocation url="../logout.cfm?reason=sessiontimeout" > > addtoken="no"> > > </cfif> > > > > would that still "qualify" for a lock? and if so would I > > just lock the whole > > <cfif> ? > > > > -- > > Critz > > Certified Advanced Bald White Barefoot ColdFusion Developer > > > > Crit[s2k] - <CF_ChannelOP Network="Efnet" Channel="ColdFusion"> ______________________________________________________________________ Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
