I'd go for the Cookie option. Kind Regards - Mike Brunt, CTO Webapper http://www.webapper.com Downey CA Office 562.243.6255 AIM - webappermb
"Webapper - Making the NET work" -----Original Message----- From: S. Isaac Dealey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 11:29 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Re: onTap chat room... > I'm getting an error on the first page and then when I "connect" I get > nothing where the flash portion is supposed to be. > > Win2k, NN 6.21 > > Hatton Yep, you probably tried to access it while I was trying to fix it. :) Try it again, I modified the <cfapplication> tag ... Make sure you accept the cookies <blech> ... I think there may be a way to avoid the cfid and cftoken variables all-together although this would require passing a unique key as a form or url variable ( since at some point both client and session variables are liable to rely on that cfid / cftoken pair anyhow ) ... I'll have to muddle with it some more when I get home and see what I can come up with... QUICK POLL: the cfid and cftoken pair in this case are only used to prevent nick duplication, i.e. 2 users in different locations sharing the same name in the chat. Which is better ( or worse dpov ) passing a unique key to the chat entry via url or form variables or requiring cookies? ... I don't like either solution, but them's what we gots... Isaac Dealey www.turnkey.to 954-776-0046 ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
