Personally, I avoid using catch all addresses.  The first time you get hit
with a dictionary attack to your mail server and have 50,000+ messages in
your catch all address mailbox you will wish you assigned the addresses one
by one.  Using a catchall also makes it diffucult to turn off the addresses
that are compromised, you now have to add a rule our router entry to
blackhole the bad addresses since you are catching all...

Justin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Erika L. Walker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2002 9:36 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: RE: Skimmin the list.......? [oT]
>
> This is what we do as well. Very effective and easy to remember --- if
> you have the ability to have a catch-all on your domain name, 
> that only
> you receive....Since I am the admin of ALL email addresses for us, I
> catch all the wildcards.
> 
> Erika
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> >>| -----Original Message-----
> >>| From: Brad Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] 
> >>| 
> >>| What's the difference in spamex.com and setting up a wildcard?
> >>| 
> >>| For instance, if your website asks for my email address, 
> >>| I'll put [EMAIL PROTECTED]  If I get junk from 
> >>| that address, I know who's responsible.  Plus, it's easier 
> >>| to remember which "disposable" address I entered for your site.
> 
> 
______________________________________________________________________
Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to