> Nope. We're running CF 5 here. After working in Perl for > years, I'll freely admit (gripe? yell? complain bitterly?) > that the CF 5 regexps don't quite stack up. Is the CFMX RexEx > parser any better? > > Not that that'd convince my boss to upgrade. If it ain't > broke, don't fix it, I suppose.
While CF MX is really, really nice, and speaking as a Macromedia partner, I'd recommend that you buy it right away - and get extra copies for the family, the dog, etc. - if you're running CF 5 on Windows, you might want to take a look at this: http://www.rixsoft.com/ColdFusion/CFX/PCRegEx/ It's a Perl-compatible regex engine within a CFX. Enjoy! Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ voice: (202) 797-5496 fax: (202) 797-5444 ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
