[deletia] > term constructor is a well understood term in software development > circles and it means the same thing in every language that supports > constructors. Thus it is incorrect to use the term with CF > since CF does > not have constructors.
Could you not make the same point about Arrays? Should we not call them Arrays just because they don't start with zero? Anyone coming from C++ or Java will already get the idea that not everything is portable. Heck, anyone who uses more than one language is used to this. > I suggest referring to this "feature" of CFCs by calling it the > component body. Then you can say all code placed inside the component > body will be executed at instantiation. This is easy to say and > perfectly correct. > I think the CF world can survive w/ two different points of view. ;) ======================================================================= Raymond Camden, ColdFusion Jedi Master for Macromedia Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Yahoo IM : morpheus "My ally is the Force, and a powerful ally it is." - Yoda ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
