my personal opinion is that pre-CFMX you are better of sticking with WDDX. It was and is a technology which was cut down before it could really make some inroads.. It is still pretty complete and useful.
N -----Original Message----- From: Askew, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 29 January 2003 15:40 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [cf-xml] general question What are you trying to accomplish? wddx has some pretty specific problems that it can help solve... it all depends on what you are trying to do. >-----Original Message----- >From: Saul Rothbart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2003 9:40 AM >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: [cf-xml] general question > > >Hi, >I'd like to ask if anyone would care to share some insight on >the pros and >cons of cf-xml and wddx. > >On the surface, it seems like wddx has a number of advantages >with respect >to faster learning curve, rapid deployment and cross platform >integration. > >Thanks in advance. >Saul Rothbart > > >-----------------------+ >cf-xml mailing list >http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm > -----------------------+ cf-xml mailing list http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm -----------------------+ cf-xml mailing list http://torchbox.com/xml/list.cfm
