|
Thank you for the advice. It's good to know I
exhausted most every option. I had looked at the use of the SQLXML API,
but had ruled it out due to the sensitive nature of my application. In
addition, I'm not too partial to making an extra HTTP requests when I may have
other low level protocols available to me. I guess I'm just gonna use ADO via
CF.
On a side note I was unable to pull up your
article, they may have taken it down. In your article, did you talk about
the reasons why CF and this feature of SQL 2K, won't interoperate? Do you
know if my assumption about the column name being too long for CF's use, is
correct? Just being over curious I guess.
Thanks again for the help. If anyone else has
any other ideas or opinions, feel free to chime in.
-Brian
|
Title: Message
- [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Brian LeGros
- RE: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Simon Horwith
- RE: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Brian LeGros
- RE: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Simon Horwith
- Re: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Brian LeGros
- RE: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Simon Horwith
- Re: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Brian LeGros
- RE: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Lomvardias, Christopher
- RE: [cf-xml] CF5, SQL Server 2K Question Askew, Jason
