You're right, so let's get some hard facts about who uses it on this
group login to sourceforge and go here,
http://sourceforge.net/survey/survey.php?group_id=32780&survey_id=12064
And if you can show me a methodology that is more popular than fusebox I
will cease to use that as a basis also. On another note popularity is a
reason to use a product just for the sheer fact that you will get better
community support, but that is neither here nor there. That survey will end
this debate at least for this list.
Robert Everland III
Dixon Ticonderoga
Web Developer Extraordinaire
-----Original Message-----
From: Zac [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 06, 2001 4:10 PM
To: CF_OpenSource
Subject: RE: CMS project comments
At 03:25 PM 8/6/2001 -0400, you wrote:
>and Fusebox was the most popular on the list.
If you want to make a decision to use Fusebox then fine (that's why you're
the boss) but can we please stop using this as a rationale for it?
If you want to use Fusebox then that's the methodology that we'll use but
this constant reiteration of its popularity it not only unproven but
totally and utterly without any merit at all.
If you want to defend your choice then please do so with some sort of
benchmark that is not only quantifiable but at least germane.
--
I do not want people to be agreeable, as it saves me
the trouble of liking them.
JaneAusten
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
