Depends on what they are talking about. I see project management as the abiity to meet deliverables within constraints.
Sounds like they may be talking about methodology, which defines the project to be managed. Each studio has their own favour, with each stage having dleiverables, something like this: 01-Identification *Creative Brief *Proposal 02-Definition *Functional Specification *Wireframes 03-Initial Concepts *Designs *Storyboards *Proof of Technology *DB Schema 04-Development *DB Build *Site Build *Admin Build 05-Deliver & Maintenance Chad who has his own flavour On 1/28/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hi all > > its been a while, hope you are all ok > > i have just started a new contract. > > on all past contracts i have applied what i know about project > management, and i have done very well, the client is happy, the > sofftware is good, full project management to a t > > but recently, i have started work with another company, and they > require a 'standard' project management plan that fits in with the > 'corporate way to do it' method > > although i am well versed n project management in my own scope, does > anyone have any 'standard' ways of project management. > > it amazes me how much companies will spend to have something done in > their way, rather than using methods which i know work. i realize that > this could be a statement which could open a can of worms, but hey, > here we go, just wondered about the methods used > > many thanks > > jamie > >
