Sorry to burst your bubble, but I'll eat my hat if CF8 has significantly enhanced cfscript support. I also think that break points are an extremely long shot.
On 5/9/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I've had the exact same thoughts, more along the lines of writing the code > in a familiar like java and preparsing / compiling the code back to cf > stuff. > > It wouldn't be that hard, I was thinking supporting a simple java syntax > rather than cfscript so that I could get rid of those pesky gt lt bits. > > Only thing stopping me from doing that is version 8. Hopefully it will do > this for me or similar. > > Regards > Dale Fraser > > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Haikal Saadh > Sent: Tuesday, 9 May 2006 09:47 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Where have all the CF developers gone? > > > I've actually fantasied taking that 10%, wrapping in functions, and > injecting in on startup to web-inf.component. Or extend > web-inf.component, and include those methods, and have all my code > extend the new and improved component. > > Has anyone done this yet? If not, why? > > Dale Fraser wrote: > > I'd also imagine taking the 10% of stuff you cant do with CFSCRIPT and > > including this would be easy. *snip* > > > > > -- > Haikal Saadh, Applications Programmer > Teaching and Learning Support Services > K405, Queensland University of Technology, Kelvin Grove Campus > [EMAIL PROTECTED], 3864 8633 > CRICOS No. 00213J > > > > > > > -- Mark Stanton Gruden Pty Ltd http://www.gruden.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
