[cfaussie] Re: Whats so bad about the tag syntax?

Thu, 11 May 2006 18:37:19 -0700

There are situations where the choice can make a difference in development and maintenance performance though. In situations where there is heavy output and the coding is (should be?) relatively simple, tags make sense and fit in with the flow. When the purpose of the code is mainly functional and possibly very complex, I think the terse cfscript is better.

Blair

On 5/12/06, Geoff Bowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>Well pre CFMX the cfscript did used to run faster, but now that it is Java
>based for Coldfusion this argument is now debatable.

What is debatable is that anyone on this list was working in an
environment where the performance difference between CFSCRIPT and tags
on <=CF5 was ever a factor that could be reliably measured.

What is now fact is that CFSCRIPT and tags have no perceivable
performance differences as both are compiled to the same Java byte
code.

Arguments on the use of CFSCRIPT for performance reasons have never
been good.

-- geoff
http://www.daemon.com.au/




--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to