Ok, fair enough, I just don't think that it should be a function that is written into CF pages. As I mentioned before, it just seems to me like an easy way to make a CF server unavailable (if used unwisely).
-----Original Message----- From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Robin Hilliard Sent: Thursday, 31 August 2006 2:48 PM To: Robin Hilliard Cc: cfaussie@googlegroups.com Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Sleep is good Was: Why bother with sleep On 31/08/2006, at 2:40 PM, Robin Hilliard wrote: > Hey Joel, > > While usually you want to get the response back asap, there really > are good reasons for a server to put a thread to sleep in some > situations And another quick point - CF threads regularly go to sleep without you explicitly telling them to - cfquery, cffile, cflock, cfhttp etc all sleep while they wait for calls to I/O, lock semaphores or other network services to complete/clear/return. Robin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
