Barry - I don't think he's talking about multiple inheritence - which can't be done in CF.
He's talking about a scenario where inheritence goes up more than one level. I just didn't want to get the issue confused. Regards, Mark On 9/19/06, Barry Beattie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > yes Dale, don't use it. > > you have to ask yourself why. you might be better off with the > decorator pattern (eg mix-ins) > > some gotchas's with multi inheritance: > > variables scopes are shared across object and base CFC's (variables > scope is protected, not private) > > paths to the base cfc are fixed. no dynamic paths so you have to get > your base classes in the right spot... and keep them there. > > if you're after a second opinion, suggest asking on the cfczone CFCDev > list. smart ppl there with good reasons why. > > (having said that, Hal Helms uses a baseComponent.cfc almost > exclusively. see:http://cf-bill.blogspot.com/2005/11/basecomponentcfc.html) > > eh, my 2c > barry.b > > On 9/19/06, Dale Fraser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I have never used multiple level inheritance in CF but have a need. > > > > > > > > From what I read it works, although super can only access parent. > > > > > > > > Is this correct, any gotcha's I should be on the lookout for? > > > > > > Regards > > Dale Fraser > > > > http://dale.fraser.id.au > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
