Well I have a java object that doesn't have a toString() :-)
On 3/29/07, Haikal Saadh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Actually, 100% of java objects will have a toString(), as > java.lang.Object has toString(). > > Whether toString() does anything useful is an entirely different matter. > > Also bear in mind that primitives won't have toString(), which is why I > asked if he was dealing with byte[] or a wrapper class. > > But then again, as I mentioned in my earlier email, it's a little moot > for people using java 5, as it has autoboxing. CFers will still have to > exercise caution, though, as JDK 1.4 does not have that feature. > > Andrew Scott wrote: > > Duncan, > > > > LOL, should have thought of that because 98%+ of java objects all have > the > > toString(); so you could have done f.Content[1].toString(); > > > > > > > > Andrew Scott > > Senior Coldfusion Developer > > Aegeon Pty. Ltd. > > www.aegeon.com.au > > Phone: +613 8676 4223 > > Mobile: 0404 998 273 > > > > > > > -- > Haikal Saadh > Applications Programmer > ICT Resources, TALSS > QUT Kelvin Grove > > > > > -- Senior Coldfusion Developer Aegeon Pty. Ltd. www.aegeon.com.au Phone: +613 8676 4223 Mobile: 0404 998 273 --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---