Actually that's not true, WP/F was announced to chase headlines as you put
it at the beginning of last year.



Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au
Phone: +613  8676 4223
Mobile: 0404 998 273

 

 

From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Friday, 27 April 2007 3:06 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: What's it all mean for CF developers? [Flex now Open
Source'd]

 

http://www.codeplex.com/Project/ProjectDirectory.aspx?TagName=WPF

 

We do enough in the OS space we don't always chase headlines for it ;)  


 

On 4/27/07, Bjorn Schultheiss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: 

Hey Scotty, 


 

When will microsoft be open sourcing wpf :)


 


 


 

 

On 27/04/2007, at 2:32 PM, Andrew Scott wrote:






 

Scott,


 

I knew it would not be long for you to voice your opinion on your blog.


 

But let's take a step back for a minute, Adobe have done a great job with

Flex as Macromedia before them. But one thing that seems to be missing and

Scott you touched on it, but I do not think that you fully looked into it.


 

I see the Open Source a great positive approach to reducing their

developers, and development time and resources. This isn't very evident,

except that the Apollo source went this way for the same reason, in my eyes

anyway to give the teams developing the browsers the opportunity to

incorporate Apollo support, I see no difference with this approach and Flex

support in browsers.


 

And the stupid thing we have a M$ evangelist sitting here, and making a

comment about this and a comment about that. But have you once put the

respective back on your own Employer at all?


 

Microsoft when they announced WP/F already stated that they would not

develop, past their own OS. Now this may have changed in time, but what M$

was actually saying is that although we will not support unix, mac or

whatever here is the source code and if anyone wants to develop for those

platforms then that would be good.


 

This is no different to Adobe, except they already have that platform

independence where M$ do not. And the added bonus, of opening the source up

is allowing for more product integration than ever before. There is nothing

stopping people from integrating a better support of flex into CF than ever

before now, and the beauty is that it will not be Adobe investing in that.

It becomes open to others to look at this option, taking the pressure away

from Adobe's developers who can go and work on other bigger and better

things in the meantime.


 

And of course I could be wrong too....


 

But Scott, you really need to look in your own backyard first....


 


 


 

Andrew Scott

Senior Coldfusion Developer

Aegeon Pty. Ltd.

www.aegeon.com.au <http://www.aegeon.com.au/> 

Phone: +613  8676 4223

Mobile: 0404 998 273


 


 


 


 

 

Regards, 

Bjorn Schultheiss 
Senior Developer 
Error! Filename not specified.
Personalised Communication Power 

Level 2, 31 Coventry St.
South Melbourne 3205,
VIC Australia

T:  +61 3 9674 7400
F:  +61 3 9645 9160
W:   http://www.qdc.net.au <http://www.qdc.net.au/>  

((------------This transmission is confidential and intended solely for the
person or organization to whom it is addressed. It may contain privileged
and confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, you
should not copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you
believe you received this transmission in error, please notify the
sender.---------------)) 


 





--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to