>1. Energy/matter cannot be created nor destroyed through natural >methods. So what you listen to science on some theorys but not other theories with more evidence?
>2. The Universe cannot create itself. If it created itself, then >anything can create itself; and the Universe can have a "Mind" of its >own. So if a universe was to create it's self anything can create it's self? how do you know this? what evidence do you have? have you seen a universe create it's self? you must have, hence shooting your self in the foot >3. Fine-tuning of the Universe. Fine tuning? >4. Laws of physics do not order themselves. They have no goals. but if someone created them shouldn't they be created with a goal? >5. No oscillating universe; no multiverse. you have evidence of this? Stephen Hawkin recently spoke of the multiverse, the worlds most respected physicist speak of the multiverse, maybe you can correct them. >6. Universe moving towards entropy (or heat death). you have evidence for this? >7. Planets do not form through natural methods. this is false, this has been observed, this is basic gravity 101 >8. Gases scatter/dissipate quickly. Therefore, Jupiter have been >created. this is false, how does a gas dissipate in space, basic laws of gravity explain jupiter. the only thing that could cause them to dissipate would be gravity, hence the reason jupiter exists. >9. Saturn has three rings. They have been set in place. saturn has a lot more then 3 rings. and how do you define set in place? they are continually moving, planets are moving through space. >10. A Theory: the Earth is near the center of the Universe. This idea >supports the Bible. this is absoloute false not only this, we are on the edge of the milky way, 4/5's the way out >11. The Earth is not millions of years old. Notes: Magnetic field >decay; Archaeology; History, other "Time limiters." Note: Ancient >people were as smart as modern men. Evolutionists have no excuse. there isn't an archeologist in the world or a geologist in the world that would agree with this. don't try and prove science incorrect without science. >12. Misplaced fossils; Wrong sequence of geological strata/layers; >Polystrata fossils are enemies of Uniformitarianism and Evolution. the event of a fossil forming is so rare that even it alone proves how old the earth must be. go dig up the pet cat ya burried in the back yard as a kid and see if you have a fossil. >13. Decay rates are not constant. Note: Even the speed of light is not >constant. Radiometric methods are unreliable. Example of a flaw: A >radiometric method showed that primate skull KNM-ER 1470 was 212-230 >million years old. Even evolutionists rejected it. 1 bit of research was incorrect so all research ever through out history is incorrect? >14. NATURAL life can only come from life. Abiogenesis (or spontaneous >generation) is impossible. Life is simply self replicating molecules. >15. The DNA double-helix, self-repair codes, self-checking system/ >algorithms, structure, DNA language convention, irreducible cell >complexity, and chromosome count are enemies of evolution. it self repairs? please explain retro viral DNA and also cancer >16. DNA of humans differ/vary by about 10-12% from each other. 50% of >human DNA is identical to the DNA of a banana. Humans and apes have no >common ancestor. this is incorrect the difference is no more then 3%, humans share 60% DNA with a banana, Humans and apes have common ancestors, and they both share the same retro viral DNA, as well as different retro viral DNA which clearly shows when the species split. this is scientific fact. >17. Common sense and science reveal the fact of "Intelligent Design." >There are cells which are more complex than New York City or modern >space shuttles. common sense? complexity shows the age of the earth, complex things come via gradual slow change from less complex things. >18. There is no real vestigial/useless organ. There is no junk DNA. >Note: Males' nipples "arouse" women. absolute rubbish, please explain retro viral DNA, also you can't seriously believe nipples were created soley to arouse woman. what happens when a 2 headed snake is born? or a hemaphrodite. thanks for the sexual tip though I'll be sure to wear tassles on my nipples next time I'm involved in a sexual act. >19. Mutations are harmful, deadly, and destructive to genetic codes. >Example: Cancer. over whelming majority of mutations are of no benefit to the organism, this is scientific fact. you have also just debunked your number 15 lol >20. Natural selection and Sexual selection do not eliminate >destructive genetic codes. if they are destructive to the organism before sexual maturity they will be eliminated, how ever if not they will stay in the gene pool just like retro viral DNA >21. The fossil record and the "Cambrian Explosion" are enemies of >evolution. There were NO "mice-bats" with one wing or two wings each >having 25% bone structure. There were NO walking fishes. no walking fishes? they exist today, they walk from one pond to another, you also have walking eel's your making up stuff now. >22. The Lord gave humans a conscience, morals, and advanced >intelligence. you obviously haven't met the people I've met. >23. Strong evidence of a Global Flood in the past. This fact supports >the Bible. Geologic layers were formed quickly and catastrophically. >Note: Hydro-plate theory. there is zero evidence of this not a respected geologist on the planet will agree with this. >24. No historical record gives clues about "evolution." absolute rubbish, how do you define historical? the fossil record clearly shows this, along with DNA, useless DNA, retro viral DNA, mitochondrial DNA, DNA in general, cancers, mutations, DNA changes, neanderthal man, Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA. >25. Scientists can use false or "biased" data. Examples: Piltdown man >deception, Lucy mistake, Archaeopteryx mistake. There was no lucy mistake your making crap up. your trying to use some science but also prove science wrong without science. >26. Evolution is science fiction (a myth). It is similar to the story >of the Centaurs (horse-men) and Mermaids (fish-women). I don't believe >in Centaurs and Mermaids. Evolution is in the bology circles and science in general is considered a scientific fact. the theory of evolution is a scientific theory. everything in science is a theory, thats the beauty of science it allows it evolve as more evidence comes in, for over 150 years more evidence of evolution has come in every day and not 1 single bit of evidence against it has been found. Evolutionary theory has more evidence then the theory of electricity or gravity, no one has ever seen electricity or gravity, why doesn't your weird twitsted group attack the theory of electricity >27. Philosophers love wisdom. But, only God is truly wise. Atheists >are not philosophers. They are not free-thinkers. So you've met god? Evolution and atheism are 2 totally different things. there is atleast 3 well published studies one by Mensa mangezine that clearly show atheists have a far higher IQ and think far more freely. they make up 10% of the US population but only 0.2% of the prison population. there is also very smart religious people in the world, but I'm simply proving you incorrect and not attacking religion. >28. Science is closely related to knowledge or information. These >things are useless if there is no God. True scientists trust in the >Creator of the Universe. absolute rubbish, science is searching for the truth, you don't say this is the truth and only search for evidence relating to it lol, you try and prove it wrong till it becomes a fact. >29. Atheism or evolution does not provide a solid foundation for >morality. If there is no God, there is no good nor evil. Atheism is the belief in no god. evolution is a scientific theory, evolution is a change in the traits of living organisms over generations which occur via natural selection. >30. Evolution is a myth. Even if it is true, there are evolutionists >who believe in God. Evolution has nothing to do with god, it doesn't try and prove god, it just explains with science the way life continually evolves. it's people like you who have a issue with it for what ever reason because it conflicts with some of your bronze age ideas you consider fact without using the scientific method. Evolutionist can believe in god, evolution has nothing to do with god and never has and never will. >31. Every time atheists and evolutionists cannot answer a valid >question, they say, "It's an Unexplained Mystery." Thus, they have >blind faith. they don't say that, they say "science is getting closer to explaining that everyday" once again, atheists may not believe in evolution. and evolutionist may be religious. >32. All those who have sinned deserve to suffer in Hell forever. G your god is so loving Dam I know this is some automatic bot but I couldn't help my self lol. I'm still amazed how people can believe in electricity but not simple genetic mutations which clearly has much more evidence. these freaks give religion a bad name. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
