The page refresh does seem a little slower in IE6 than FF, but from here I can't compare it with compression turned off :)
I'd say it is fairly 'normal' to use http compression. I think most sites would. Keep in mind you're compressing the HTTP response, not the .cfm file as such. I have seen a few issues with compression and IE. I recall some problems with PDF's and some versions of IE. Just exclude certain folders or file types as required. Ok, I heard about the charity ride already. On Dec 20, 2007 6:18 PM, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > OK, been testing the http compression of the CF files. It seems > (internally) that the compression of the coldfusion files speeds things up a > lot....! But... only in FireFox, in Internet Explorer it seems to have > slowed it down. > > Only thing I guess this could be, is Internet Explorer not handling the > compression well???? Anyone know of any issues with IE and http compression? > And most importantly, is anyone else seeing the speed difference between IE > and FireFox on www.clickfind.com.au (any page)??? Is anyone else > compressing the CFM files? > > PS. check out our charity ride > http://australian-search-engine.blogspot.com/ > > -- > >>> http://www.clickfind.com.au > Looking for a business, product or service? Try the new Australian search > engine <http://www.clickfind.com.au> www.clickfind.com.au > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
