Because you did not read my post.

For apache to run under Vista 64bit, the application pools need to be in
32bit mode enabled. Or did you miss that?

 

 

From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Owen West
Sent: Monday, 14 April 2008 5:31 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Coldfusion 8U1 and Vista

 

Andrew,

 

I would certainly agree that in shrinkwrap code release you would simply
expect an installer routine to figure this sort of thing out. Actually, as
you mentioned, you'd expect to have problems with a beta release, not a rtm
release! Kind of the opposite of what actually has happened...

 

Although, for the life of me I cannot figure out why somebody would have a
32-bit IIS on a 64-bit Windows OS? How would one even end up this way? Is
the IIS packaged with Windows 2003 x64 or IA64 only a 32-bit version? I
could not imagine that being the case? I could understand Apache, esp if a
non-tech user had downloaded the 32-bit version for their PC or laptop, but
on a server this would (to me anyway) be something of a strange case... 

 

Nevertheless, Andrew you are absolutely right - we would expect this sort of
thing to "just work". It should auto-detect the proper connector to use, or
at least throw a warning on screen AND in a log file indicating the
situation, not just fail silently.

 

Cheers,

 

Owen West  M.SysDev (C.Sturt) MCP MCAD MCSD
Computer Programmer 
Applications Development Team

Information Technology & Telecommunications
Hunter New England Health
Ph: (02) 4921 4194
Fax: (02) 4921 4191
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



>>> Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 14/04/2008 4:05 pm >>>

Yes, but you expect the installer to do its job foremost!!!

If like me you had forgotten that IIS was also in 32bit, then why does the
installer not pick this up? Like I said first post, there is no error what
so ever until you try to run a cfm template. And to then run the CF
Connector generates all kinds of errors, and unless you know that you have
to run it as administrator can be a gotcha as well.

At the end of the day, I came across this by accident. Not even browsing the
beta forums was of any help on this. And to make it worse Beta versions
worked fine. Like I stated.

I think more checking in the installer needs to be done, so users don't get
caught out on this like I did.

 

Andrew Scott
Senior Coldfusion Developer
Aegeon Pty. Ltd.
www.aegeon.com.au <http://www.aegeon.com.au/> 
Phone: +613  9015 8628
Mobile: 0404 998 273

 

 

From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Owen West
Sent: Monday, 14 April 2008 3:26 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Coldfusion 8U1 and Vista

 

I have been reading the release notes and install guides (I know, but I
needed to get some sleep and that seemed like the best way)  :-)

 

It does mention that there are about 77 different combinations of 64-bit and
32-bit CF and IIS and Apache...you need to install the proper web server
connectors, and also make sure you use the proper connectors when connecting
to your web server, depending on whether you have 64 or 32 bit parts...it
all seems a bit confusing really...

 

Then again, maybe this is just Vista being Vista?

 

Owen West  MCP MCAD MCSD
Computer Programmer 
Applications Development Team

Information Technology & Telecommunications
Hunter New England Health
Ph: (02) 4921 4194
Fax: (02) 4921 4191
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



>>> "CyberAngel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 12/04/2008 5:23 pm >>>

Ok....

 

If anyone is interested this seems to be a bug in the installer. I have
Apache running on this machine and the only way to have it run was to have
the pools run in 32bit mode. So the support of 32 bit was enabled.

 

The installer seems to not know this and adjust accordingly, maybe right
maybe not.

 

So when I switched the connectors to use 32 bit for coldfusion bingo, the
cfm sites worked again. The moment I switched these pools to not enabled 32
bit the sites no longer worked. Until I switched the 32 bit upport for
coldfusion connectors off.

 

Oh well 4 hours of frustration and installing, but why the hell it seems to
want to work this way in the release version was beyond me.

 

Problem solved, so if anyone else runs into this you'll have another KB for
you tools of how to for Vista 64bit and Coldfusion 8J

 

 

 

 

From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2008 12:15 PM
To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 8U1 and Vista

 

Well this maybe a "after the fact" tip, but in future i'd recommend you
install beta products on virtual machines. In the event an RTM/RTW occurs
you can swap out your code base on a fresh install.

 

Thus removing the headache your in now ;)

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 12:10 PM, CyberAngel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

No it shouldn't but it does for some unknown reason...

 

 

 

From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
Of Scott Barnes
Sent: Saturday, 12 April 2008 12:02 PM 


To: cfaussie@googlegroups.com
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 8U1 and Vista

 

my humble apologies ;) i missed the beta context. It shouldn't make a
difference but... whom knows.

On Sat, Apr 12, 2008 at 11:56 AM, CyberAngel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Scott...

 

Did you miss the point of me saying that I had the Beta installed and
working fine? And did you miss that I downloaded nte new 64bit release?

 

And I thought you we had been on a role and you go and do that to meJ

 

For everyone else's info, I can install the beta 64bit Coldfusion release
fine and it runs. The official release WTF happened?

 

 

 

 

 

<BR

<BR


--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to