Barry, > >> REST is not just the flavor of the month in web 2.0 companies it's >> actually >> a very good way of doing things. > > except if that's not an option, and all you're left with is a bunch of > webservices, especially if they're .NET webservices requiring security > credentials and tokens, rah, rah. >
Oh yes, totally agreeing here. >> To get things like WS-Security, WS-Transaction, WS-Encryption or >> other >> WS-* specs working, you're on your own. > > you mean the clash between the Microsoft way of doing the WS > enhancements, and every body elses? > Sorry if that was creating a misunderstanding - I basically meant every WS enhancement from MSFT and also the spec'ed out "standard" WS enhancements which work fine in Java for instance - when it comes to using any of those in CF 6-8 you're on your own. And I haven't event started to rant about interop between Java and .NET. Better don't get me started :-) Those guys: http://www.ws-i.org/ have put in an effort to improve things (which was successful to a certain extent). Cheers Kai _________________________________________________ Kai Koenig - Ventego Creative Ltd ph: +64 4 476 6781 - mob: +64 21 928 365 / +61 450 132 117 web: http://www.ventego-creative.co.nz blog: http://www.bloginblack.de --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
