Barry, I have a few thoughts for you, if it remains unresolved. First, I notice that your stack trace has this near the top:
java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged That makes me wonder, and it's just a guess: do you have Sandbox or Resource Security enabled in CF? The former is the name in Enterprise, and the latter is the name in Standard. Either of those would have CF checking to ensure that a given file was appropriate to be requested by CF. This would *NOT* be something inherently "new" in CF9. It's a feature that goes back to CF 6 (and has roots in something added in CF4). Whether you installed CF9 from scratch or did an upgrade, there would be no new implementation of Sandbox/Resource security. Now, it could be that you had it enabled for the previous server, and it pointed to things that were correct for that, but in the new server somehow the configuration is no longer correct. Again, this is all a guess. See the 'Security" section of the CF Admin to check on that. Second, if that's not it, I would recommend that you could help us help you better by providing a complete stack trace for one of your requests that are hanging in the native method state, because somewhere it may show reference either to a line of code that's the root of your problem, or it may show something else that could be significant. Third, here's another guess: did you perhaps have the CF Admin "trusted cache" feature enabled in the old configuration, and perhaps in the new one you maybe have not enabled it (it is off by default)? I ask because if it was not off, then ever request for every CF page would be checking the file system to see if the template source had changed, and if so it would then recompile it. Especially if your source code is on another server or SAN/NAS, that i/o can be costly in some configurations (not inherently so, but worth considering). Fourth, you replied below to Kym about logging but s/he had asked about the CF Server monitor. (Even then, I don't quite see where it would have an impact on file access, but let's see what s/he has to say.) Finally, as far as monitoring SAN use, I just blogged about a free tool that may be of interest to some. See: http://www.carehart.org/blog/client/index.cfm/2010/5/17/free_tools_for_san_vm_monitori ng_more (And if that link above breaks as you read it in your email program, please don't complain. Just join it back together. :-) /charlie > -----Original Message----- > From: cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaus...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf > Of > BarryC > Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 8:35 PM > To: cfaussie > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: Coldfusion 9 and Windows server 2008 64bit > > I have ensured logging is not on, I'm not 100% sure if it was on or > off, but my subsequent tests are all the same response times. > > What do you mean by a file with a funny opr two in the middle? > > Barry -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To post to this group, send email to cfaus...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
