@Dale and Andrew
I don't think he made the call by himself, he definitely gave the
reasons why though, well only 1 really, can't find enough CF
developers...

@ Robin
I think getting into Uni is not so much get them using as a base for
teaching the programming, pascal -> C++/Java does a fantastic job
already. But maybe encourage students to use it for their projects
(esp final year projects).

@mpicker
Thanks for that nugget of info of adobe not throwing in CF into the
deal, adds to the case that Adobe can do a lot more in these parts...

On May 27, 11:32 pm, Barry Beattie <[email protected]> wrote:
> don't forget that Microsoft actively woo University tutors, young
> instructors and students with various programs. The relationship
> between the teaching staff at Q.U.T and Microsoft is a bit too close
> for my liking as far as probity, but I've lost my links to demonstrate
> this, and it might be old outdated news. It's been a few years since I
> worked there.
>
> but I mean, how can Adobe do anything with the likes of this?
> Especially since it's a good relationship/deal for students.
>
> http://www.mquter.qut.edu.au/http://www.itnews.com.au/News/103828,microsoft-giving-away-dev-tools-...https://student-partners.com/default.aspx
>
> barry.b
>
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Andrew Myers <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Would have been a lively meeting i'm sure :)
>
> > Not saying it applies in this case, I think there is a belief that if
> > developers for a particular technology are scarce they cost more, if they're
> > plentiful they cost less (in theory).  .NET has appealed to some I've worked
> > for because they can always tells us they are one day going to send all our
> > work offshore.
>
> > I don't necessarily subscribe to this point of view myself but I think it's
> > how
>
> > On 27/05/2010, at 10:38 PM, "Dale Fraser" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >> Interestingly enough we had the man himself that made this decision at the
> >> Melbourne ColdFusion User Group tonight.
>
> >> And he has valid reasons for moving on, the main one being that they
> >> already
> >> have a lot of .NET developers and have had trouble recruiting CF
> >> developers
> >> so made the decision to just have a single technology.
>
> >> I think this isn't such a bad decision, in that business.
>
> >> Regards
> >> Dale Fraser
>
> >>http://dale.fraser.id.au
> >>http://cfmldocs.com
> >>http://learncf.com
> >>http://flexcf.com
>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On
> >> Behalf
> >> Of Barry Beattie
> >> Sent: Thursday, 27 May 2010 9:52 PM
> >> To: [email protected]
> >> Subject: Re: [cfaussie] Re: JB-HI Moving to dotnet
>
> >>> TAFEs have a different problem. Teaching specific technologies is part of
>
> >> their brief. There is some limited curriculum material available (based on
> >> the commercial courses) for vocational colleges to teach using the Adobe
> >> products, but what TAFEs need are teachers with the skills to teach these
> >> languages.
>
> >> me me me. That's how I was brought, kicking and screaming, to CF - I
> >> had to teach it. I've been looking, Robin, but no TAFE's are looking
> >> for experienced and qualified CF teachers in my city. You hear of one?
> >> let me know, OK?
>
> >>> Adobe can't magic these people into being - they have to come from the
>
> >> community.  If you're a contractor or a full timer looking to moonlight as
> >> an evening instructor, have you considered approaching your local TAFE or
> >> community college and offering to run a web development course?  Emma
> >> Jones
> >> (nee Steer, some of you may remember her as the Canberra Macromedia UG
> >> manager for several years) has been having some success with Flash and the
> >> local TAFEs around Wangaratta. Maybe someone with some pedagogical bent
> >> could start a wiki for lesson plans and extra course material and ideas
> >> for
> >> people who wanted to get into this.
>
> >> I would have thought that a barometer to do that would be the strength
> >> of short courses delivering this.
>
> >> Brisbane North TAFE (my employer until earlier this year) has sewn up
> >> the TAFE short course scene with their Adult Community Education
> >> courses (over a weekend or so). But to be honest, they get more go
> >> from lead-lighting and wine appreciation than computer languages. It's
> >> a Micky-Mouse operation and practically anyone can offer something to
> >> them. If they reckon their cut is worthwhile, they might listen.
>
> >> The only other way courses could be delivered out of the TAFE system
> >> is either accredited (you get a qualification - CertIII,Cert IV, Dip)
> >> and CF would be one platform to learn on
>
> >> or non-accredited specialist short courses.
>
> >> Both delivered out of faculty, not third-party (you have teachers with
> >> tenure to consider here). FYI Brisbane Nth (Ithaca campus) has IMHO
> >> the best reputation for IT for all the Brisbane TAFE's.
>
> >> I've designed courses while at QANTM up to Diploma level (it's not
> >> hard if you know what you're doing) that incorporated CF.
>
> >> There is a real need to do pre-testing before admittance - an aptitude
> >> test. At QANTM any Diploma course, the hard break-even (class
> >> size/enrollments) was 12. 15 was a soft break-even that got you some
> >> cred to get resources. Class sizes of 20 or more guaranteed it would
> >> run next year. Two or more classes of 20 means they would look at a
> >> mid-year intake as well. I was never able to get those numbers so the
> >> course couldn't fly (and that was with 3 languages - CF, PHP and
> >> ASP.NET/C# - on two platforms - Linux and Win - with a decent section
> >> on Flash/Flex apps and a bit on video streaming).
>
> >> Half a dozen people sitting in a 3 day short-course delivered by a
> >> private training provider is as much as you can expect, methinks. You
> >> certainly couldn't do that every week for the instructor to pay their
> >> mortgage...
>
> >> my opinion only. No cents offered here. I've none left.
>
> >> barry.b
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "cfaussie" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
>
> >> --
> >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> >> "cfaussie" group.
> >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> >> [email protected].
> >> For more options, visit this group at
> >>http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.
>
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "cfaussie" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > [email protected].
> > For more options, visit this group at
> >http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en.

Reply via email to