Hi Charlie, Actually I've tried just switch to use Java 8 with CF9 and it is at least working for me to do with TLS 1.2. I was able to send the request through the secured connection and get response back. And I can verify in JRun logs that it is using TLS1.2 so everything looks great in that area.
The reason we are looking at migrating to Lucee is indeed CF9 is just too old. There is a need to upgrade it anyway. Was thinking about upgrade to CF11 as I've done that a couple of times at my previous job. But Lucee as you said is free and I've heard good things about it so that is probably the main reason for us to consider it - potentially saving cost in the long run. Cheers, On Sat, Feb 25, 2017 at 1:51 AM, charlie arehart <charlie_li...@carehart.org > wrote: > Just curious, Xiaofeng, are you making that move because you found that > (despite our discussions in this thread) you found you could NOT get CF > 9.0.2 to work with TLS 1.2, even upon updating to Java 8 (as was your > original question)? I get that you may say that you’re moving to Lucee for > other reasons (like to get an updated CFML engine for free vs updating to > CF 10/11/2016 that DO support Java 8). > > Just want to know for the sake of closing out the discussion here, if > others may be in the same boat (on CF9). Thanks. (And Peter’s comment there > about CFDocument is interesting. I’d not heard of that being an issue, if > one changed CF9 to use Java 8. I’ll be curious to hear if anyone else tries > and/or confirms it.) > > > > /charlie > > > > *From:* cfaussie@googlegroups.com [mailto:cfaussie@googlegroups.com] *On > Behalf Of *Xiaofeng Liu > *Sent:* Thursday, February 23, 2017 11:13 PM > *To:* cfaussie@googlegroups.com > *Subject:* Re: [cfaussie] Re: Is it even possible to get CF9.0.2 with JDK > 1.7 to support TLS1.2? > > > > Hi Peter, thanks for the heads up. > > > > Mostly we r planning to migrate to Lucee. > > > > On 24 Feb 2017 7:46 am, "Peter Pham" <vdung.pe...@gmail.com> wrote: > > We were getting similar error as well and tried to upgrade JRE. > > For most parts it was ok. However, I recalled that there was some gotchas > during PDF generation (Can't remember the exact problem) > > And eventually we had to roll it back. > > If you do try, mind checking if any code running <cfdocument> is still > smoothly. > > > > P > > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "cfaussie" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- Best regards, Xiaofeng,^_^ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "cfaussie" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cfaussie+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to cfaussie@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
