"Andrew Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:21815@cfaussie... > > Mark, > > I'm unfamiliar with ebXML, if it's an XML parser you might like to look > at the custom tag soXML, I've had no experience with it though: > > http://devex.macromedia.com/developer/gallery/info.cfm?ID=A28467B5-F7B9-11D6 -840E00508B94F85A&method=Full
Beware the pitfalls: For the occasional use, soXML might be good, but never in a higher volume production environment. We hit rather severe memory leak problems with xml.dom (which soxml uses) and CF5, using the tag to parse some 700 XML packets on a daily basis. It would cause the server to crash, eventually, even with 1gb of physical memory and a shitload virtual. Because the packets were highly structured, I came up with a "hack" to perform enough S&R 'parsing' on the packet content to make it pass as WDDX. Dirty, but it worked without flaw. Besides that, CFMX is some 500 times faster than soXML for parsing simple documents. Well maybe not exactly 500, but certainly a magnitude in the hundreds. Cheers, J�rgen funkdancer.com --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
