Thnx Phil, seeing that I got the code working, I have not really gone in and tried the second approach yet, I was going to do this when the numbers in my database increased. I will place your e-mail in the same folder that I have for this issue and eventually get to it and sort it all out. I must admit however (hope I am typical) that once you get something working, you leave it alone!
 
I know that some of you will say that good enough is not good enough and better is best, and that you should always strive to have the most efficient code, given you can usually get something to work via different means, yet one may be far more forgiving. I guess its a compromise of time and energy and style.
 
Thanks Phil.
 
Ron...
 
-------Original Message-------
Hi Ron / Vik,

I think you'll find the 'previous' logic won't work - I suspect it will
always give the first 20 records,
regardless of how many times they have pressed 'Next'.
It would work if you changed the order by to DESC, but then the records
would be displayed
in reverse alphabetical order.

Phil.

____________________________________________________
  IncrediMail - Email has finally evolved - Click Here
---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/ ---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/

Reply via email to