Do you have the origin of the article?? That is probably one of the biggest misinformed, beat-up piece of trash I've had the misfortune of reading through. I'd be keen to further rebutt the piece in whatever forum it appears.
Yours up in arms,
-- geoff http://www.daemon.com.au/
Robin Hilliard wrote:
John,...snip..8<...
I've cced cfaussie on this rebuttal so that others can use it/add on to it. The author seems to have it in for us in a big way. He doesn't have the vaugest idea what he's talking about in terms of the history of CFMX's development. The bugs they refer to were fixed soon after the inital release.
*MX compared to 5.0 *
Cold Fusion 5.0 was probably the peak of the evolutionary mountain in Cold Fusion. Though it had some reliability issues that 4.5 did not, it boasted a number of extremely powerful features no available before. However, MX is definitely a step back downhill.
--- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
