|
gee, Aaron. that’s cute! >> , this means
you can do anything you damn well please with it. Anything. it’s taken me
while to appreciate this fact! cheers barry.b From: Aaron DC
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Barry I programmed in Dataflex for a couple of years, many moons
ago, and love Cold Fusion for exactly the same reason: it is an interpreted
language. Basically, this means you can do anything you damn well please with
it. Anything. I whipped this up after you posed the question, tested it and it
works. You can play with it to your heart's content to make it more robust - I
only put one check in (to make sure it's an assignment statement). File: with.cfm ========== <CFIF thisTag.ExecutionMode EQ "End"> Example usage: ============ <CFSET test = StructNew()> Possible enhancement ideas: 1. change delimiters to #Chr(13)# & ";" and
then you could have .ele1 = "hello";.ele2="there"; etc etc 2. make the tag recursive or handle nested calls and you
could nest <CF_with ...> constructs
does CF (maybe within CFSCRIPT) have something like VB’s WITH
keyword when working with object methods and properties? eg: WITH myObject .val1
= var1 .val2
= var2 .addnew() END WITH --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004 |
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH" ? Mark M
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Gary Menzel
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Barry Beattie
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Aaron DC
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Brett Payne-Rhodes
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Barry Beattie
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Elliot Russo
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Aaron DC
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Sean A Corfield
- [cfaussie] Re: CF version of VB's "WITH"... Mark Woods
