I agree,
but be sure to use CFFLUSH after you CFDUMP.. hey its an old joke but sitll funny.
Personally if we wanna go the whole hog in XHTML, i say we all should wind it up to Strict XHTML.. why.. because we can and we roxors.
Thats my 2c
Scott Barnes. http://www.mossyblog.com "Will code XHTML for food"
Gary Menzel wrote:
So if you are going to go to a standards mode site - don't expect to get much joy out of <cfdump>.
But - if you were using CFDUMP I would think that it was not a "production" site in any case? At least I dont consider CFDUMP to be a "production" tool. So if I had a page that had CFDUMP on it I would be worried more about why it was being displayed rather than about being standards compliant (at that point in time).
Regards, Gary Menzel
--- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
