> >From a CFMX perspective, I would warn off it - only because the DOT > notation is used in STRUCTs to create the hierachy.
Well I am a bit hesitant about it, but I need to define the object path and property in a field name, I could do inpPerson_Employee_positionTitle, but then I'd have to do a replace on the _ and I like seeing it with the dots ;-) Reason for doing this is because I have a cfc that looks at what objects are used and retrieves the appropriate xml to validate the data, i.e. inpPerson.Employee.positionTitle will become this.meta[ Person.Employee ] and the attribute name is "positionTitle" Now, if I can't use the dot notation I can still do this, but then it just became a bit messier... So are we sure this going to cause problems? ;-)) Gary, I could not visualize the issues you were pointing out, can you show me a sample? --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
