I am aware that CF has functionality for XSLT (see subject of the email ;-)
What does it depend on? Can you give me a reason to do it with CF and a reason to do it with XSLT? Taco Fleur Tell me and I will forget Show me and I will remember Teach me and I will learn > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf > Of Geoff Bowers > Sent: Sunday, 29 August 2004 5:16 PM > To: CFAussie Mailing List > Subject: [cfaussie] Re: xmlTransform or transform with cf? > > > Taco Fleur wrote: > > I know you can transform XML with XSLT or CF itself, I myself would > > think its best to do it with CF, I don't see any advantage > of bringing > > in another technology to do the transformation, i.e. XSLT. > > But maybe I am wrong, can anyone shed some light on this? > > It really depends on what you want to do. It's worth noting > that CFMX > includes functions for XSLT transformations, so XSLT is very > definitely > part of the standard suite of CFMX tools. > > -- geoff > http://www.daemon.com.au/ > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
