>>> It'd be nice to have [etc] agreed, although in VB objects were passed around byRef anyway. I miss having the choice too for simple variables and arrays.
I suspect that it's too hard to do - it's like wanting the underlying Java to have pointers... OK, so what's the diff between the arguments passed when you do this 1) obj.method(theArg=localVar) vs this 2) obj.method(theArg="#localVar#") geez, it'd be great if the first was byRef and the second byVal... my 2c barry.b -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Adam Cameron Sent: Tuesday, 5 October 2004 5:55 PM To: CFAussie Mailing List Subject: [cfaussie] Re: copy > wrong language/platform > you want VB's ByRef, ByVal by the sounds of it... Which was my point. It's possible and useful in other languages. And it's half-arsed and illogical in CF. Hence the suggestion: >>> It'd be nice to have [etc] Adam --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
