On Wed, 6 Oct 2004 14:20:33 +1000, Taco Fleur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Tell me exactly which part of my method of attack does not hold water? I > found a solution to super.init( argumentsCollection = arguments ) a solution
But it's a *terrible* solution to a "problem" that most (all?) people wouldn't even encounter - because that's just not the problem to worry about. I really do worry about some ColdFusion developers... I've seen some of the most peculiar "solutions" to "non-problems" amongst the CF community... far more so than I've ever seen in nearly 25 years of computing amongst all manner of programmers. > I'm a newbie to OO too, although I understood many of the concepts before I > could give it the fancy name Inheritance, encapsulation, or polymorphism Then maybe you should accept that you're trying to solve a non-problem and that when other folks suggest simple solutions (like passing positional arguments) they're doing so from a position of some authority? Doesn't mean they're automatically right but doesn't mean you are either... > I don't get pissed off Unfortunately, others do :( Taco, you post some interesting conundrums and I thank you for that because it makes us all think hard about problems. That's a good thing. But sometimes you make a "problem" out of a non-problem when there really are much simpler, much more intuitive solutions. And this is definitely one of those cases... -- Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ Got Gmail? -- I have 5 invites "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
