Yeah.. but it's free ;o) But in all seriousness - I did emphasise it as in the initial post, it was said: 'I know Homesite 5.5 wont be as good as Dreamweaver MX2004 or Homesite+ but I'm on a budget.'
So obviously 'free' is better for a budget than 'costs something' is all. But fair point. Did I mention CFEclipse is free ;o) Mark On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 09:56:49 +0800, Brett Payne-Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for the insight. Sounds like the old PIII might be ok. > > The fact that CFeclipse is 'free' seems to get mentioned quite a lot. > While I applaud the efforts of people who can afford to give away their > time, just because a piece of software is 'free' doesn't really mean > much to me. Effectively, Homesite is 'free' for me too as I am a Devnet > subscriber. IIS and .asp are both 'free' (as I understand it) after you > buy the OS of course - but I don't use either of them even though I own > the OS. CF is also not free, and yet we choose to use it (or our > employers do) even though PHP is *almost* as good. The list goes on. > > I'm not having a go, just making an observation that in the end > economics isn't necessarily the key factor in our decisions about the > tools we employ. > > Thanks again, > > > > Brett > B) -- E: [EMAIL PROTECTED] W: www.compoundtheory.com ICQ: 3094740 --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
