Yup, that's how the name came about. Hal and Ben felt that it was sufficiently dissimilar to Fusebox that calling it any sort of Fusebox variant would have just confused people...
On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 18:10:28 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "...Lest people forget, the "II" in Mach-II isn't just a Roman numeral--it > stands for "Implicit Invocation," meaning methods are invoked implicitly > based on events that are occuring within the system. Maybe having an event > that gets kicked off by a user clicking a button isn't quite the same thing > as the system itself announcing an event, but that's really an issue of how > the event gets kicked off, not whether or not an event exists. They're both > still events as far as Mach-II is concerned..." > > And the Mach part I assumed was "breaking new ground/barriers" - ie breaking > the speed of sound or something like that. --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
