Note to self: Read entire thread before posting... .. hehehe..well.. GMAIL and all (no excuse).
On Mon, 28 Feb 2005 15:32:45 -0800, Sean Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:20:55 +1100, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > So that means that Mach-II is based on the singleton pattern then! > > Mach II is based on a lot of patterns but it's a bit of a stretch to > say it's based on the singleton pattern. The framework CFCs exist only > once - but that's how they are created in mach-ii.cfm (using brute > force and structKeyExists() tests on application scope). Each named > listener, filter and plugin exists only once but that's more to do > with just how the framework builds its representation in memory. There > really isn't a single pattern implemented there in the sense of what > Darryl is saying. > -- > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/ > Team Fusebox -- http://www.fusebox.org/ > Breeze Me! -- http://www.corfield.org/breezeme > Got Gmail? -- I have 49, yes 49, invites to give away! > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/ > -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
