On Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:30:13 +1100, Andrew Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Daryl, > > Yeah it did a little, but I would have thought that if I had looked at > Mach-II that it would be obvious that one would be aware of the memory that > method would use.
Or... "Sorry Sean, It wasn''t meant to be rude remark but in my own opinion i assumed you were aware that i'd be up to speed on memory effeciency, no harm no foul"... Now that has a nicer tone to it then the above (both really) replies to it...doesn't it?..good then.. Key to good rambling is to have positive attitude.. and accept responsibility when you are wrong about a subject matter thats open to a forum such as this... sif i'm ever wrong though...bwhahahah.. -- Regards, Scott Barnes http://www.mossyblog.com --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
