>From the casual observer, that post was made at 12:49 AM... and made
absolutely no sense.  Mind you, I'm reading it at 4:01 AM, so what do I
know.

This time check brought to you by...

Chad

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sean
Bucklar
Sent: Thursday, 3 March 2005 12:49 AM
To: CFAussie Mailing List
Subject: [cfaussie] Re: OT: Omg.. alienware suck...


The following  comments are made based on the understanding of a layman
and should not be used for anything at all, ever, under any
circumstances. IANAL, or doctor or plumber. Consult a plumber, doctor or
lawyer as appropriate before taking action based on any of my advice. No
responsibility is accepted for anything. By reading the following
comments you implicity and irrevocably agree not to take legal action
against me with regards to said following comments. I don't have
anything worth suing me for anyway.

The case in reference was a notable landmark case in that it determined
that for purposes of australian litigation a publication can be
determined to be published where it is read.

IE if I publish <some stuff> on the intraweb, under australian law,
legislation/litigation applicable to my copywrite, libel liability, etc,
is determined based on where the article is read, not on where I was
when I wrote said article. IOW the NY times is liable under Australian
law for content published in New York, but read in Australia, as if the
article was published in Australia.

My understanding is that the referenced case had no bearing, directly or
indirectly on consumer protection with internation purchases. Once again
I would stress however that IANAL and assuming that I know what I'm
talking about is a very silly idea.


On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 15:03:44 +1100, Chris Dawes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> 
> 
> Hello Scott,
> 
> 
> 
> 
> to the contrary, any service that is provided to an Australian 
> customer can be taken to court in Australia, even if it's a us firm.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> I sight the case where Joseph Sputnik (or whatever) sued The New York 
> Times in an Australian court, and it was found that as the offence 
> happened in Australia to an Australian it was within it's 
> duristiction.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Dawesi
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > Yet another reason why i love GMAIL..
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > heheh sadly i need a local Aust company..i don't trust a company 
> > that
> 
> > i can't legally fight in Australia :)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 14:41:31 +1100, Ben Smith
> 
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> >> Wish I had a laptop with decent sound. My Toshiba Satellite A10 
> >> does
> 
> >> pretty much nothing but fart and crackle, and forget about playing 
> >> a
> 
> >> bass note.
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> Also, gmail added this helpful google ad link to the bottom of the
> thread:
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> http://alienware-exposed.com/alienware_laptop.html?google
> 
> >> 
> 
> >> ---
> 
> >> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> 
> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> >> Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/
> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Best regards,
> 
>  Chris                            mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To 
> unsubscribe send a blank email to 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Aussie Macromedia Developers:

> http://lists.daemon.com.au/


-- 
Sean Bucklar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

/"\
\ /    ASCII Ribbon Campaign
 X   Just say no to HTML/Rich text Email!
/ \

---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To
unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/


---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [email protected]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aussie Macromedia Developers: http://lists.daemon.com.au/

Reply via email to